Monday, January 23, 2006

AMEN!

“The ‘curative model’ narrowly focuses on the goal of cure. … From many quarters comes evidence that the view of health should be expanded to encompass mental, social and spiritual well-being.”

Institute for the Future

Makes your head spin...

“Gwen has wonderful health insurance and an abundance of healthcare. What Gwen does not have is health. And there is nothing our health system can do to give it to her.” “The battle cry is always health, but in fact the struggle has always been over healthcare.” “For all its inspiring, high-tech cures, medicine is just not very effective at curing our era’s major killers.” “Medicine doesn’t do much [for] chronic disease.” “When the most common killers of our era are mostly incurable and our preventive treatments pretty feeble, you have to wonder about medical care as a whole.” “There is a widely held view that medical care contributes little to health.” (John Bunker/
Journal of the Royal College of Physicians)


Source: Tom Farley & Deborah Cohen, Prescription for a Healthy Nation

Saturday, January 21, 2006

A tale of two faiths...

Both faith expressions are dealing with the impending death of a family member. Both tragic and too early. Both families declare themselves to be God fearing people. Both are grieving and sad. One is appropriate. The other is toxic.

The first family has gathered around their daughter who is 40 years old and is dying from a multitude of causes unrelated to anything she has done. Her mother tells that "since she was one year old she has fought so many things and as always pulled through. She is not going to pull through this." Mom is accurate. She's not happy about it, but the evidence is undeniable. The family is telling stories, crying, laughing, remembering, praying and grateful for their care. Mom asks for supportive prayer that God will be gracious to her daughter. Their faith is real, being challenged, open and honest.

The second family has also gathered around their son who is dying from AIDS at 35. The moment I enter the room mom starts preaching "Oh, chaplain, I am so glad you are here. We are just praying for Bobbie that he will live, but I have to tell you about what I read today in Acts 9. It's about the prodigals coming home and how we have to accept them even though they are not clean."

"What?" I stammer, as I look at the patient who is disengaged from everything in the room and mostly his mother.

Mom thens goes into a diatribe about a wedding she did recently. I will say this again. A wedding where she preached "to" them until they got it.

"Who is the prodigal?"

"What?"

"Are you the prodigal?"

"No I AM NOT!"

I look at the patient in the eyes and say "if I can be of service to you please let me know. The chaplains are here for you."

I walk out shaking my head.

Toxic faith is frighteningly evil whether it be taliban or christian.

how much cream do you need?

Thursday, January 19, 2006

Let the rant begin!

1. Alcohol is a bitch. Two patients are shaking and rattling their beds as I write with the DT's. Clueless to the tears, anger and fear that their spouses and families are enduring because of their legal drug use.

2. The American Medical system is more screwed up than Iraq. Thankfully, my family and I have good medical insurance; in fact, really good insurance, but the system is screwed. The underserved, poor, elderly and children and working poor don't have a rats chance of getting good care anywhere other than their local ER. I am starting to believe in socialized, read equalized medicine where the lady with 50 plastic surgeries is told to get a life and her Doctor is sent to Liberia if she does or even consents to do one more surgery on the nut.

3. On TV, 80% of patients recover after being intubated (respitory tubes) and in real life in America only 10% recover. Stop lying to people.

4. "Evidence based" medical practice that many medical blogs report to be doing is a bigger lie than Iraq. It's practicing medicine because somethings the Doc's have no F$#@^& clue what's happening. Yes, it is based on research and practice and tradition, but if Bextra and other research and fake research have shown anything. It's not all science, much of it is $$$. The inability of Doctors to live in the ambiguity of the real world, of life and death, of what is known and what is unknown and best guess is bullsh$##!

5. The patient is the most important person in the room.

Thus endith the rant!

Friday, January 13, 2006

Total pain!

"Chaplain, what I really want is some relief. This jsut won't go away and I can't take anymore. I know I am losing it. I know I am dying. I don't want to, but I know I am. But this is too much. I am SO angry. What am I going to do?"

Learned and experienced a new clinical term this week; which is called total pain.

Sally is a middle aged, married, mother of three. She has recurrent metastatic cancer. Her oncologist has given her a timeline of life expentancy (which some oncologists are debating the value of that!). Her oldest son has recently started running away from home, her kids grades are dropping and her husband works extended hours to avoid coming home to a house in turmoil. Add to that, because of their massive medical bills money is more than tight. Three of Sally's family have died with this disease in the last three years; one a year in each of the last three years. She is openly asking and fearfully wondering is 2006 my year to die? Two others are sick and battling the disease. She feels that God has stopped answering her prayers. Oh and NO ONE is willing to get help, counseling or talk about their fears, anger, worries or emotions just to name a few things.

Sally's prognosis is bad. Very bad. Her Doctor has told her she should get her life in order and start making final arrangements.

Total pain is when your medical condition, your psycho-social relationships, your spirituality and your emotions are in crisis and chaos all at the same time and with the same intensity. Sally is in total pain.

She and her family have burdened my heart and soul.

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

Wonder what's wrong with healthcare?

Bad Blood

In the Treatment of Diabetes, Success Often Does Not Pay

Published: January 11, 2006

With much optimism, Beth Israel Medical Center in Manhattan opened its new diabetes center in March 1999. Miss America, Nicole Johnson Baker, herself a diabetic, showed up for promotional pictures, wearing her insulin pump.




Third of four articles:
The Business of Care

Second Article in the Series: Living at an Epicenter of Diabetes, Defiance and Despair (January 10, 2006)

First Article in the Series: Diabetes and Its Awful Toll Quietly Emerge as a Crisis (Jan. 9, 2006)

Bad Blood: Diabetes in New York

In one photo, she posed with a man dressed as a giant foot - a comical if dark reminder of the roughly 2,000 largely avoidable diabetes-related amputations in New York City each year. Doctors, alarmed by the cost and rapid growth of the disease, were getting serious.

At four hospitals across the city, they set up centers that featured a new model of treatment. They would be boot camps for diabetics, who struggle daily to reduce the sugar levels in their blood. The centers would teach them to check those levels, count calories and exercise with discipline, while undergoing prolonged monitoring by teams of specialists.

But seven years later, even as the number of New Yorkers with Type 2 diabetes has nearly doubled, three of the four centers, including Beth Israel's, have closed.

They did not shut down because they had failed their patients. They closed because they had failed to make money. They were victims of the byzantine world of American health care, in which the real profit is made not by controlling chronic diseases like diabetes but by treating their many complications.

Insurers, for example, will often refuse to pay $150 for a diabetic to see a podiatrist, who can help prevent foot ailments associated with the disease. Nearly all of them, though, cover amputations, which typically cost more than $30,000.

Patients have trouble securing a reimbursement for a $75 visit to the nutritionist who counsels them on controlling their diabetes. Insurers do not balk, however, at paying $315 for a single session of dialysis, which treats one of the disease's serious complications.

Not surprising, as the epidemic of Type 2 diabetes has grown, more than 100 dialysis centers have opened in the city.

"It's almost as though the system encourages people to get sick and then people get paid to treat them," said Dr. Matthew E. Fink, a former president of Beth Israel.

Ten months after the hospital's center was founded, it had hemorrhaged more than $1.1 million. And the hospital gave its director, Dr. Gerald Bernstein, three and a half months to direct its patients elsewhere.

The center's demise, its founders and other experts say, is evidence of a medical system so focused on acute illnesses that it is struggling to respond to diabetes, a chronic disease that looms as the largest health crisis facing the city.

America's high-tech, pharmaceutical-driven system may excel at treating serious short-term illnesses like coronary blockages, experts say, but it is flailing when it comes to Type 2 diabetes, a condition that builds over time and cannot be solved by surgery or a few weeks of taking pills.

Type 2 , the subject of this series, has been linked to obesity and inactivity, as well as to heredity. (Type 1, which comprises only 5 percent to 10 percent of cases, is not associated with behavior, and is believed to stem almost entirely from genetic factors.)

Instead of receiving comprehensive treatment, New York's Type 2 diabetics often suffer under substandard care.

They do not test their blood as often as they should because they cannot afford the equipment. Patients wait months to see endocrinologists - who provide critical diabetes care - because lower pay has drawn too few doctors to the specialty. And insurers limit diabetes benefits for fear they will draw the sickest, most expensive patients to their rolls.

Dr. Diana K. Berger, who directs the diabetes prevention program for the City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, said the bias against effective care for chronic illnesses could be seen in the new popularity of another high-profit quick fix: bariatric surgery, which shrinks stomach size and has been shown to be effective at helping to control diabetes.

"If a hospital charges, and can get reimbursed by insurance, $50,000 for a bariatric surgery that takes just 40 minutes," she said, "or it can get reimbursed $20 for the same amount of time spent with a nutritionist, where do you think priorities will be?"

Rest of story

Sunday, January 08, 2006

Sometimes there is justice in the world!

Mouse Thrown Into Fire Sets Home Ablaze


Jan 8, 11:51 PM (ET)

FORT SUMNER, N.M. (AP) - A mouse got its revenge against a homeowner who tried to dispose of it in a pile of burning leaves. The blazing creature ran back to the man's house and set it on fire.

Luciano Mares, 81, of Fort Sumner said he caught the mouse inside his house and wanted to get rid of it.

"I had some leaves burning outside, so I threw it in the fire, and the mouse was on fire and ran back at the house," Mares said from a motel room Saturday.

Village Fire Chief Juan Chavez said the burning mouse ran to just beneath a window, and the flames spread up from there and throughout the house.

No was hurt inside, but the home and everything in it was destroyed.

Unseasonably dry and windy conditions have charred more than 53,000 acres and destroyed 10 homes in southeastern New Mexico in recent weeks.

"I've seen numerous house fires," village Fire Department Capt. Jim Lyssy said, "but nothing as unique as this one."

Be afraid; very afraid!

Diabetes and Its Awful Toll Quietly Emerge as a Crisis


By N. R. KLEINFIELD
Published: January 9, 2006

Begin on the sixth floor, third room from the end, swathed in fluorescence: a 60-year-old woman was having two toes sawed off. One floor up, corner room: a middle-aged man sprawled, recuperating from a kidney transplant. Next door: nerve damage. Eighth floor, first room to the left: stroke. Two doors down: more toes being removed. Next room: a flawed heart.

Diabetes, soaring among New Yorkers, has already left a mark on Diane and Aniello Discala of the Bronx. She lost a leg to its complications.

As always, the beds at Montefiore Medical Center in the Bronx were filled with a universe of afflictions. In truth, these assorted burdens were all the work of a single illness: diabetes. Room after room, floor after floor, diabetes. On any given day, hospital officials say, nearly half the patients are there for some trouble precipitated by the disease.

An estimated 800,000 adult New Yorkers - more than one in every eight - now have diabetes, and city health officials describe the problem as a bona fide epidemic. Diabetes is the only major disease in the city that is growing, both in the number of new cases and the number of people it kills. And it is growing quickly, even as other scourges like heart disease and cancers are stable or in decline.

Already, diabetes has swept through families, entire neighborhoods in the Bronx and broad slices of Brooklyn, where it is such a fact of life that people describe it casually, almost comfortably, as "getting the sugar" or having "the sweet blood."

But as alarmed as health officials are about the present, they worry more about what is to come.

Within a generation or so, doctors fear, a huge wave of new cases could overwhelm the public health system and engulf growing numbers of the young, creating a city where hospitals are swamped by the disease's handiwork, schools scramble for resources as they accommodate diabetic children, and the work force abounds with the blind and the halt.

The prospect is frightening, but it has gone largely unnoticed outside public health circles. As epidemics go, diabetes has been a quiet one, provoking little of the fear or the prevention efforts inspired by AIDS or lung cancer.

In its most common form, diabetes, which allows excess sugar to build up in the blood and exact ferocious damage throughout the body, retains an outdated reputation as a relatively benign sickness of the old. Those who get it do not usually suffer any symptoms for years, and many have a hard time believing that they are truly ill.

Yet a close look at its surge in New York offers a disturbing glimpse of where the city, and the rest of the world, may be headed if diabetes remains unchecked.

The percentage of diabetics in the city is nearly a third higher than in the nation. New cases have been cropping up close to twice as fast as cases nationally. And of adults believed to have the illness, health officials estimate, nearly one-third do not know it.

One in three children born in the United States five years ago are expected to become diabetic in their lifetimes, according to a projection by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The forecast is even bleaker for Latinos: one in every two.

New York, perhaps more than any other big city, harbors all the ingredients for a continued epidemic. It has large numbers of the poor and obese, who are at higher risk. It has a growing population of Latinos, who get the disease in disproportionate numbers, and of Asians, who can develop it at much lower weights than people of other races.

It is a city of immigrants, where newcomers eating American diets for the first time are especially vulnerable. It is also yielding to the same forces that have driven diabetes nationally: an aging population, a food supply spiked with sugars and fats, and a culture that promotes overeating and discourages exercise.

Diabetes has no cure. It is progressive and often fatal, and while the patient lives, the welter of medical complications it sets off can attack every major organ. As many war veterans lost lower limbs last year to the disease as American soldiers did to combat injuries in the entire Vietnam War. Diabetes is the principal reason adults go blind.

So-called Type 2 diabetes, the predominant form and the focus of this series, is creeping into children, something almost unheard of two decades ago. The American Diabetes Association says the disease could actually lower the average life expectancy of Americans for the first time in more than a century.

Even those who do not get diabetes will eventually feel it, experts say - in time spent caring for relatives, in higher taxes and insurance premiums, and in public spending diverted to this single illness.

"Either we fall apart or we stop this," said Dr. Thomas R. Frieden, commissioner of the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.

Yet he and other public health officials acknowledge that their ability to slow the disease is limited. Type 2 can often be postponed and possibly prevented by eating less and exercising more. But getting millions of people to change their behavior, he said, will require some kind of national crusade.

The disease can be controlled through careful monitoring, lifestyle changes and medication that is constantly improving, and plenty of people live with diabetes for years without serious symptoms. But managing it takes enormous effort. Even among Americans who know they have the disease, about two-thirds are not doing enough to treat it.


Nearly 21 million Americans are believed to be diabetic, according to the Centers for Disease Control, and 41 million more are prediabetic; their blood sugar is high, and could reach the diabetic level if they do not alter their living habits.

In this sedentary nation, New York is often seen as an island of thin people who walk everywhere. But as the ranks of American diabetics have swelled by a distressing 80 percent in the last decade, New York has seen an explosion of cases: 140 percent more, according to the city's health department. The proportion of diabetics in its adult population is higher than that of Los Angeles or Chicago, and more than double that of Boston.

There was a pronounced increase in diagnosed cases nationwide in 1997, part of which was undoubtedly due to changes in the definition of diabetes and in the way data was collected, though there has continued to be a marked rise ever since.

Yet for years, public health authorities around the country have all but ignored chronic illnesses like diabetes, focusing instead on communicable diseases, which kill far fewer people. New York, with its ambitious and highly praised public health system, has just three people and a $950,000 budget to outwit diabetes, a disease soon expected to afflict more than a million people in the city.

Tuberculosis, which infected about 1,000 New Yorkers last year, gets $27 million and a staff of almost 400.

Diabetes is "the Rodney Dangerfield of diseases," said Dr. James L. Rosenzweig, the director of disease management at the Joslin Diabetes Center in Boston. As fresh cases and their medical complications pile up, the health care system tinkers with new models of dispensing care and then forsakes them, unable to wring out profits. Insurers shun diabetics as too expensive. In Albany, bills aimed at the problem go nowhere.

"I will go out on a limb," said Dr. Frieden, the health commissioner, "and say, 20 years from now people will look back and say: 'What were they thinking? They're in the middle of an epidemic and kids are watching 20,000 hours of commercials for junk food.' "

Of course, revolutionary new treatments or a cure could change everything. Otherwise, the price will be steep. Nationwide, the disease's cost just for 2002 - from medical bills to disability payments and lost workdays - was conservatively put by the American Diabetes Association at $132 billion. All cancers, taken together, cost the country an estimated $171 billion a year.

"How bad is the diabetes epidemic?" asked Frank Vinicor, associate director for public health practice at the Centers for Disease Control. "There are several ways of telling. One might be how many different occurrences in a 24-hour period of time, between when you wake up in the morning and when you go to sleep. So, 4,100 people diagnosed with diabetes, 230 amputations in people with diabetes, 120 people who enter end-stage kidney disease programs and 55 people who go blind.

"That's going to happen every day, on the weekends and on the Fourth of July," he said. "That's diabetes."

One Day in the Trenches

The rounds began on the seventh floor with Iris Robles. She was 26, young for this, supine in bed. She wore a pink "Chicks Rule" T-shirt; an IV line protruded from her arm. For more than a year, she had had a recurrent skin infection. The pain overwhelmed her. Then came extreme thirst and the loss of 50 pounds in six weeks. In the emergency room, she found out she had diabetes.

She was out of work, wanted to be an R & B singer, had no insurance. It was her fourth day in Montefiore Medical Center. Her grandmother, aunt and two cousins have diabetes.

"I'm scared," she said. "I'm still adjusting to it."

Next came Richard Dul, watching news chatter on a compact TV. Now 64, he has had diabetes since he was 22. A month before, he had a blockage in his heart and needed open-heart surgery. He was home a few days, but an infection arose and he was back. Postoperative infections are more common with diabetes. This was his 21st straight day in the hospital.
Skip to next paragraph


Here, then, was the price of diabetes, not just the dollars and cents but the high cost in quality of life.

Simply put, diabetes is a condition in which the body has trouble turning food into energy. All bodies break down digested food into a sugar called glucose, their main source of fuel. In a healthy person, the hormone insulin helps glucose enter the cells. But in a diabetic, the pancreas fails to produce enough insulin, or the body does not properly use it. Cells starve while glucose builds up in the blood.

There are two predominant types of diabetes. In Type 1, the immune system destroys the cells in the pancreas that make insulin. In Type 2, which accounts for an estimated 90 percent to 95 percent of all cases, the body's cells are not sufficiently receptive to insulin, or the pancreas makes too little of it, or both.

Type 1 used to be called "juvenile diabetes" and Type 2 "adult-onset diabetes." By 1997, so many children had developed Type 2 that the Diabetes Association changed the names.

What is especially disturbing about the rise of Type 2 is that it can be delayed and perhaps prevented with changes in diet and exercise. For although both types are believed to stem in part from genetic factors, Type 2 is also spurred by obesity and inactivity. This is particularly true in those prone to the illness. Plenty of fat, slothful people do not get diabetes. And some thin, vigorous people do.

The health care system is good at dispensing pills and opening up bodies, and with diabetes it had better be, because it has proved ineffectual at stopping the disease. People typically have it for 7 to 10 years before it is even diagnosed, and by that time it will often have begun to set off grievous consequences. Thus, most treatment is simply triage, doctors coping with the poisonous complications of patients who return again and again.

Diabetics are two to four times more likely than others to develop heart disease or have a stroke, and three times more likely to die of complications from flu or pneumonia, according to the Centers for Disease Control. Most diabetics suffer nervous-system damage and poor circulation, which can lead to amputations of toes, feet and entire legs; even a tiny cut on the foot can lead to gangrene because it will not be seen or felt.

Women with diabetes are at higher risk for complications in pregnancy, including miscarriages and birth defects. Men run a higher risk of impotence. Young adults have twice the chance of getting gum disease and losing teeth.

And people with Type 2 are often hounded by parallel problems - high blood pressure and high cholesterol, among others - brought on not by the diabetes, but by the behavior that led to it, or by genetics.

Dr. Monica Sweeney, medical director of the Bedford-Stuyvesant Family Health Center, offered an analogy: "It's like bad kids. If you have one bad kid, not so bad. Two bad kids, it's worse. Put five bad kids together and it's unmanageable. Diabetes is like five bad kids together. You want to scream."

The Caro Research Institute, a consulting firm that evaluates the burden of diseases, estimates that a diabetic without complications will incur medical costs of $1,600 a year - unpleasant, but not especially punishing. But the price tag ratchets up quickly as related ailments set in: an average $30,400 for a heart attack or amputation, $40,200 for a stroke, $37,000 for end-stage kidney disease.

One of the most horrific consequences is losing a leg. According to the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, some 70 percent of lower-limb amputations in 2003 were performed on diabetics. Sometimes, the subtraction is cumulative. One toe goes. Two more. The ankle. Everything to the knee. The other leg. Studies suggest that as many as 70 percent of amputees die within five years.

Yet medical experts believe that most diabetes-related amputations are preventable with scrupulous care, and that is why the offices of conscientious doctors post signs like this: "All patients with diabetes: Don't forget to bare your feet each visit."

To witness the pitiless course that diabetes can take, simply continue on the hospital tour. This one day will do. Dr. Rita Louard, an endocrinologist, and Anne Levine, a nurse diabetes educator, were making their way through the rooms at Montefiore.

Here was Julius Rivers, 58, on the sixth floor. Three years with diabetes. He had been at home in bed when he saw a light like a starburst and told his wife to take him to the emergency room. His blood sugar was 1,400, beyond the pale. (A fasting level of 126 milligrams per deciliter is the demarcation point of diabetes.)

The rest is here!

Questions like this raised every day!

Sharon Case May Raise Theological Issues


Jan 8, 6:49 PM (ET)

By BRIAN MURPHY


JERUSALEM (AP) - Like nearly everything in Israel, Ariel Sharon's condition touches both the hard-edged logic of the secular world and the vagaries of faith.

For doctors, the next medical challenge could come Monday when they start bringing Sharon out of his drug-induced coma. After that - should he need life support or fail to awaken - his case could become drawn into the thorny disagreements among Jewish scholars about the boundaries of life and what measures should be taken to sustain it.

The prime minister and his family hold the ultimate sway over vital medical decisions that may come.

But the power of Sharon's legacy could exert itself even in those critical moments - becoming a possible example for others at a time when Israeli leaders and rabbis increasingly confront issues such as the right to refuse life-prolonging measures, when to declare death and how it fits with "halacha," or Jewish law.

"When is a person alive? When is he dead? What level of intervention is appropriate? These are questions that no longer have clear-cut definitions in the modern world," said Rabbi Noam Zohar, a professor of philosophy and bioethics at Bar Ilan University.

Sharon has shown some improvement in vital signs, including the pressure inside his skull, said Dr. Shlomo Mor-Yosef, the director of Jerusalem's Hadassah Hospital, where Sharon was taken after suffering a major stroke on Wednesday. Doctors next plan to being reducing the sedative level that's kept the 77-year-old Sharon in a coma.

How he responds could raise critical questions about the powers of medical technology and the influence of Jewish traditions.

Under established Jewish legal codes, it's forbidden to do anything to hasten death. But other teachings say its permissible to remove an "impediment" standing in the way of the natural end of life, such as a feeding tube or respirator. Rabbis remain deeply divided over what constitutes an unreasonable obstacle to death.

It's likely all available medical measures would be taken for Sharon, who led a secular lifestyle that paid little heed to Orthodox Jewish views. Yet any need for life-sustaining equipment could open the kind of religious showdowns in Israel that gripped the United States over Terri Schiavo, the brain-damaged Florida woman who died last year after her feeding tube was removed.

"When you have the situation where someone can live for years on life support, it no longer becomes a question of theology. It's also brings in ethics," said Dr. Mordechai Halperin, a rabbi who heads The Schlesinger Institute, a Jerusalem-based group that studies medical technology and Jewish law.

In Israel, physicians typically defer to families or patients about whether the treatment should follow secular or religious codes.

Many rabbis follow a 1986 decision by Israel's chief rabbinate - the government's highest religious authority - that defines death as irreversible inactivity of major parts of the brain stem, which controls breathing, swallowing and other basic bodily functions.

The opinion is based on various Jewish texts including the Mishnah, an early source of rabbinical tradition, which establishes decapitation as an irrefutable sign of death. In the modern sense, the rabbis interpret a nonfunctioning brain stem as the same thing.

But others see the core of life in the heartbeat, which can occur even with a severely damaged brain stem and can continue with artificial respiration. Some rabbis cite ancient texts that say death occurs only when there is both no respiration and no "movement" in the body. They consider a heartbeat a life-signifying movement even if maintained through life-support and may counsel followers not to remove life support.

There is also an array of other rabbinical opinions on "brain death" that adds complications in Israel to issues such as organ donation which very few Israelis agree to for both cultural and religious reasons. Jewish tradition calls for keeping the human body intact both before and after death - a provision which discourages many Jews from cremation among other things.

Sharon reportedly signed an organ donor card last year, but his age would likely prevent his organs from being transplanted.

"There is no sweeping ruling on brain death ... It's a very tangled subject," said Haim Cohen, an assistant to Rabbi Yosef Shalom Elyashiv, a leading authority of Jewish law.

The issues are so delicate that it took six years for Israel's top rabbinical scholars, physicians and other experts to hammer out legislation to allow the terminally ill to refuse life support. It passed last month with one unique provision: the equipment could only be turned off by an automatic timer to avoid having a health care worker do it.

As a concession to Orthodox Jewish lawmakers, the law extends the right only to patients diagnosed with six months or less to live - and not to those in a coma or in a vegetative state.

"With all the life-sustaining measures available, it's hard to describe when death occurs in a modern hospital or intensive care unit," said Zohar. "Religion is still trying to adjust to this reality."